Sunday, January 1, 2017

The 2016 End-of-the-Year Movie Spectacular!


Ah, 2016.  In some ways, we're all ready to kick it to the curb.  It went around killing beloved artists, screaming divisive and foul political rhetoric, and forcing the world to reconsider Justin Bieber.  To paraphrase A Christmas Story, "2016!  What a rotten name!  We were trapped.  It stared out at us with its yellow eyes.  It had yellow eyes!"

OK, let's all take a breath.  Yeah, there were some lousy things that happened this year, but it wasn't all bad.  In fact, while much of the world was trying to find scapegoats for all of our problems, the movie industry actually put out quite a few wonderfully poignant films that encouraged us to work together, be compassionate, and, if the occasion arose, turn bumper to bumper traffic jams into rousing and meticulously choreographed musical numbers.

As I looked back on the year in film, the theme that seemed to jump out was hope.  Hope for the future, hope for our own potential, hope for the humanity of others....even the giant blockbuster ending the year literally leads us to the beginning of "A New Hope."  What a wonderful thing for us to all latch on to as we face an uncertain future.  Let us hope and let us be a source of hope for those around us.

Before I get to my top movies of the year, there are a few other categories I'd like to look at.

Most Underrated Movies of the Year
The Little Prince

Premiered and lauded at the Cannes Film Festival and quick to find an international audience, this gem of an animated film inexplicably struggled to find a U.S. distributor.  In fact, it was intended to be released in the U.S. in 2015, but no one would touch it, perhaps because of the esoteric nature of Antoine de Saint-Exupery's, book upon which the movie is based.  No one, that is, until Netflix stepped in.  Receiving a very limited theatrical run in August before its streaming debut, The Little Prince was hardly a blip on the radar, which is a shame because this beautiful, poetic, and at times startling film deserved to be a huge hit.  If you've got a Netflix account, I highly recommend you check out this movie.

Ghostbusters

When I heaped praise on this movie last summer, some people kind of slammed me for it, but I stand by my praise.  I know it's no classic, but far from being a blemish on the reputation of the original, it proudly stands as a genetic relative that is distinctly its own thing.  A film that could have been a callous cash-making scheme is elevated by a fantastic cast that takes OK material and energizes it to some of the most laugh-out-loud comedy of the year.  The performances of Kate McKinnon (mad-scientist with impeccable comic timing) and Chris Hemsworth (the world's greatest horrible secretary) alone make this memorable, but every other cast member gives it there all at every turn.  It may not be art, but I watched this multiple times in theaters and in its subsequent home video released and have loved it every viewing.  If anything, the only thing holding this one back was its unnecessary call-backs to the original.

Star Trek Beyond

We Star Trek fans can be a fickle bunch.  With the coming of the Abrams films, there were cries of "Too much action!" and "This isn't Star Wars!" and "Why did you ever pretend he wasn't Khan?!?" (that last one is a legitimate criticism).  Well, Star Trek Beyond attempted to answer these concerns with the first of the new series that felt like one of the old movies......and the box-office went down.  That's a shame because, while lacking the immediacy of the 2009 reboot and Star Trek Into Darkness, Beyond is a perfectly enjoyable space romp and easily rises to the upper ranks of the series.  Personally, I've loved the reboot series.  The cast is great, the writing is sharp (some may argue this point in regards to Into Darkness, but I have many counter-arguments as to how that has some of the best writing of the series), and the visual aesthetics have been consistently top-notch, and Star Trek Beyond fits in quite nicely.


Most Overrated Movies of the Year

Hail, Caesar!

This is not a bad movie in any way.  It's actually quite an enjoyable film.  George Clooney was funny, Josh Brolin was imminently likeable, and Alden Ehrenreich turned in a star-making performance.  However, the writing was a bit weak, which is very odd for a Coen Bros. film.  Not the dialogue necessarily, although even that is a bit uneven, but the plotting itself was labored and fell below their standards.  I was looking forward to this because I have a soft-spot for Coen Bros. comedies (The Hudsucker Proxy is an all-time favorite), but I left this movie strangely unsatisfied.

Cafe Society

Midnight in Paris is an absolute masterpiece and, when I heard people compare this favorably to that film, I was excited.  Unfortunately, Cafe Society is NO Midnight in Paris.  The movie holds its audience at a distance, cold when it should be warm, warm when it should be cold.  In fact, the most notable thing about this film is that, in a cast that includes Hollywood heavyweights like Corey Stoll, Jesse Eisenberg, and Steve Carrell, it's actually Kristen Stewart who shines.  Her performance is the most praiseworthy thing about this ultimately forgettable bit of froth.

Deadpool

Yep, I'm saying it's overrated.  Let the hate mail commence.  I hate to say it, but ultimately, this movie is a gimmick powered by one high-energy actor having the time of his life, and saddled with a plot, writing, and supporting cast that makes X-Men: The Last Stand (the most reviled of the X-Men films) look positively cerebral.  Let's be honest, if this film weren't wildly crass, would it have gotten out of the "Ben Affleck as Daredevil" din of superhero movies?  I really don't think it could have.

Worst Movies of the Year

Every year, this one is very hard for me because, well, I don't waste money on movies I think will be terrible.  So, here is the list of movies that I haven't seen because they either looked horrible or looked good, but got horrible word of mouth: The Huntsman: Winter's War, Warcraft, Passengers, Mother's Day, Collateral Beauty, Masterminds, Norm of the North, Keeping Up with the Jonses.  If I'm wrong and one of these is great, let me know.  I like good movies.

Most Disappointing Movies of the Year

Anything from the DC Cinematic Universe.  No, it's not just that I'm a die hard Marvel fanboy.  I consider Nolan's Dark Knight films to be some of the best crime dramas in movie history.  I loved Richard Donner's Superman and Bryan Singer's reverential tribute to it.  Heck, I didn't even think Green Lantern was the worst thing ever.  However, it has been profoundly disheartening to see DC try to emulate the success of the MCU, but disregard everything that made the MCU great.  No, it's not that DC is gritty and Marvel is bright.  The problems with Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad have nothing to do with their lack of humor and harsher plot elements.  It has to do with the complete and utter disdain with which the filmmakers treat the characters.  Marvel has tended to character arcs for their characters over the past decade.  They've done it carefully because they clearly love these characters and want them well-represented.  DC and Warner Bros. have said, "Hey, we want that kind of money!" and rushed production with half-baked stories that completely disregard the very nature of iconic characters.  Wonder Woman looks good, but so did Suicide Squad.  I'm starting to lose hope that DC will ever approach their films with the rich and thoughtful forethought found over at Marvel.  Sigh.

Independence Day: Resurgence - The first one wasn't art, but it was fun and popular.  This one isn't as horrible as some may say, but it is just a giant magnifying glass over the original and, in making every bigger, simply amplifies its flaws.


Great Performances of the Year (performers listed alphabetically):
Amy Adams - Arrival; Tom Bennett - Love & Friendship and Mascots; Sofia Boutella - Star Trek Beyond; Josh Brolin - Hail, Caesar!; Viola Davis - Fences; Julian Dennison - Hunt for the Wilderpeople; Taron Egerton - Eddie the Eagle; Alden Ehrenreich - Hail, Caesar!; Dan Folger - Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them; John Goodman - 10 Cloverfield Lane; Ryan Gosling - La La Land; Tom Hanks - Sully; Tom Holland - Captain America: Civil War; Chris Hemsworth - Ghostbusters; Kate McKinnon - Ghostbusters; Lupita Nyongo'o - Queen of Katwe; Eddie Redmayne - Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them; Mark Rylance - The BFG; Michael Shannon - Midnight Special; Kristen Stewart - Cafe Society; Emma Stone - La La Land; Maryl Streep - Florence Foster Jenkins; Denzel Washington - Fences; Mary Elizabeth Winstead - 10 Cloverfield Lane

Best Musical Moments:
La La Land: The entire movie - I'll get into this more later on, but La La Land is a "they don't make them like that anymore" kind of movie and the music plays a huge part in that.  Opening on a typical L.A. traffic jam and then transforming that into a musical jam that slowly melts into full-out musical extravaganza, the opening number, "Another Day of Sun," perfectly sets the mood for the movie, a bright, buoyant, and surprisingly layered throwback to the glory days of the MGM movie musical.

Eddie the Eagle: 80's stars unite! -  The music (both score and songs) in Eddie the Eagle is a pure joy.  Upon first watching the film, you assume the songs are lesser-known gems from recognizable 80's new wave artists.  Alas, they are NEW gems from recognizable 80's new wave artists, including Howard Jones, OMD, ABC, Go West, and Paul Young.  Plus, the vocals on the OMD track (an energetic synth-pop throwback called "Thrill Me") are terrifically handled by Taron Egerton and Hugh Jackman, the stars of the film.  Any fan of 80's music will be justifiably thrilled with the results.

Trolls: "Can't Stop the Feeling" and "True Colors" - This movie had a few nice musical moments (it's always great to hear Anna Kendrick sing), but "Feeling's" infectious hook transcends the movie to stand as one of the most fun songs of the year and "Colors" gives the movie its much needed, and unexpected, heart.

Sing Street: "Drive It Like You Stole It" - In high school, I was a songwriter and this moment in this terrific movie shows so powerfully the disconnect between an artist's imagination and the sometimes harsh reality of execution.  The lead singer envisions a Back to the Future-themed music video with amazing costumes, choreography, and production values.  In reality, it's cheesy with about six people desperately trying to snap to the beat, but in the moments when we see how the lead sees it, we're treated to a wonderful tribute to the 80's music video movement and to the act of creativity itself.

Arrival: The entire score - Johann Johannsson's music for this deeply emotional sci-fi movie is not something that you can just listen to apart from the movie.  It's not particularly melodic and has a Reich-esque minimalism to it.  However, when paired with the film, it becomes another character and creates an atmosphere that wholly separates what you're witnessing from any previous film-going experience.  It's a masterpiece that elevates an already masterful film.

Best Scenes of the Year (spoilers: If you haven't seen the movie, you might not want to read the description):
Ghostbusters: Kevin's interview - I haven't laughed harder during any moment of any movie this year than I did during this hilariously awkward and odd five minutes of comic gold.  From Kristin Wiig's character's unsubtle and inappropriate attraction to the applicant to Chris Hemsworth's Kevin asking if he could bring "my cat" to work (an animal that is actually a dog named Mike Hat), this scene is a great example of the comic prowess displayed by this cast that elevates the film.

Rogue One: Vader Unleashed - There is a moment toward the end of this very well-made movie that shows, possibly more explicitly than ever before in the Star Wars series, why Darth Vader is feared by all in the galaxy.  A group of rebels are trapped in a room with him and, what starts as a typical Star Wars battle, quickly turns into something out of a horror movie.  Imagine Michael Myers with a lightsaber and a mastery of the dark side of the force.  Truly chilling.

Doctor Strange: The Rebuilding of Tokyo - If you haven't seen this movie, this one's hard to visualize using just words.  As director Scott Derrickson explained, he knew that many comic book movies end with the destruction of a major city while the characters are trying to shut a portal.  He thought it might be fun if the climactic battle in Strange involved a city rebuilding itself while characters try to open portals.  He's right, it was a great deal of fun.  Watching the characters fight in real time while the world around them goes in reverse was a trip and a great way to play with the tropes of the genre.

Captain America: Civil War: Tarmac Fight - Hands down, my favorite scene from any movie this year.  The promise of every MCU "it's all connected" moment since Nick Fury first showed up in Tony Stark's living room realized in a thrilling, hilarious, heartfelt, character-driven battle royale.  Starting ominously, expertly blending humor and action, and ending with a jolt, this scene is, quite simply, one of the best action sequences ever put on film.


Best of the Year:
Quantifying movies is hard.  Just saying.  Recognizing quality isn't necessarily difficult, but what qualities are more important?  If a popcorn movie sets out to entertain and it does so spectacularly, is it of a lesser quality than a drama that sets out to showcase great writing?  How do you compare a Schindler's List (powerful, important, but low on the re-watchablity scale) to a Star Wars (revolutionary, exciting, endlessly re-watchable, but ultimately not as historically vital)?  I decided to give movies scores in three areas: Overall Quality (direction, acting, writing, production values, etc.), Re-watchability, and Thematic Importance (Are the messages vital?  Universal?  Important?  Timely?).  Keeping in mind, of course, that even with these criteria, it's a matter of taste and timing.  A movie that is high in all three areas to me may be very low in one of those areas to another, and, indeed, low to me in one of those areas with more or fewer viewings.

Also, it should be noted that there are many great films I haven't seen yet (it's killing me to write this before the wide-releases of Hidden Figures and A Monster Calls, but I have time now that I won't have after I see them).  If you know of a movie that you loved that isn't on the list, it doesn't mean I'm dissing it, I just may not have seen it.  Of course, I may be dissing it too.  ;)

Honorable Mentions:
Moana, Sing, Florence Foster Jenkins, The BFG, Midnight Special, 10 Cloverfield Lane, Eddie the Eagle - Any one of these films could have easily slipped in my top twenty and they all stand among my favorites of the year.

20. Ghostbusters - Propelled by fun special effects and an incredibly talented cast loaded with chemistry, this could've been a dud and, in all honesty, the screenplay is really just OK, but the cast give it a gonzo, go-for-broke energy that makes it one of the funniest comedies of the year.

19. Star Trek Beyond - Good, old-school Trek with eye-popping, new-school effects and acting.

18. The Jungle Book - On one hand, Disney is clearly just harvesting its animated classics to make more money.  On the other, the results are truly spectacular.  This time, it's not like like the similarly notioned 90's-era live-action 101 Dalmatians and Jungle Book, neither of which were horrible, but both of which were forgettable.  This time, we've gotten Cinderella and 2016's take on The Jungle Book, both of which, in many ways, actually improve upon the classics with stronger character arcs, beautiful production values, and clearly defined, yet more complex, thematic material.  Plus, The Jungle Book is one of the year's most stunning visual accomplishments.  All of which leads to.....

17. Pete's Dragon - Far and away removed from the broad comedy and bright, cartoony original, this remake is a simple, subtle, and often heartbreaking examination of love and  creating familial bonds in the face of great loss.  It feels like an independent family film and takes risks like one.

16. Kung Fu Panda 3 - Before I made my little scoring system, I actually had this one down in the "honorable mentions" section, but in looking at the three distinct areas, I couldn't deny the beautiful quality in the animation and vocal performances, the undeniable re-watchability, and the simple, but universally applicable theme of embracing who we are while simultaneously pushing ourselves to be more.  It's a primal and, ultimately, important message that this animated comedy about a kung fu fighting panda presents with thought and grace.

15. Hunt for the Wilderpeople - It would be easy, and not entirely inappropriate, to simplify this movie as "Napoleon Dynamite meets Up meets Midnight Run," as it most certainly has pronounced plot elements and atmosphere of all three of these films.  However, to do so would dismiss that wacko originality of this comedy from independent director Taika Waititi, as well as the memorable lead performances from Sam Neill and Julian Dennison as a grizzled New Zealand-bushman and the juvenile delinquent he's saddled with.

14. Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them - This one has, at times, been much higher on the list.  It's a beautiful extension of J.K. Rowling's rich imagination and it's truly a delight to see the familiar tropes of the Harry Potter world play out in 1920's New York City.  Plus, it gives us the visualization of the previously mentioned niffler, an adorable fluff-ball that steals any shiny thing it can gets its mitts on, which must include the film itself, because the little guy walks off with that too.

13. Love & Friendship - I think that Jane Austen sometimes is viewed incorrectly by much of the world.  Many see her as a creator of fluffy, somewhat inconsequential, stories about aristocratic manners in the 1800's, when she was truly a brilliantly sharp-witted satirist.  Perhaps no filmed adaptation of her works gets this better than Love & Friendship, an adaptation of her novella Lady Susan, which plays almost like a spoof of other Austen adaptations.   Director Whit Stillman uses music and editing as technical punchlines to the humor to wonderful effect.  Plus, Tom Bennett's absolutely hilarious turn as the genial, but wildly dim-witted Sir James Martin, is one of the most delightful of the year.  Moments when he pontificates about the twelve commandments, or how accomplished someone is because they enjoy "both poetry and verse", or how confusing the name Churchhill is ("I was looking for a church or a hill, but all I saw was this big house!") are uproarious and patently memorable.

12. The Little Prince - For many of the reasons I mentioned before, this undervalued gem stands high among the year's animated films.  It's poetic, beautiful, and filled to the brim with truth.  This is the kind of movie that elevates family films from simply appropriate for all ages to vital and inspiring to all ages.  Also, if I could have listed a silent, animated performance to my "Great Performances" section, the stuffed fox from this movie would have topped the list.

11. Sully - I have not been a huge fan of Clint Eastwood as a director in the past.  I believe that, much as he seems to view the world as a whole, he sees protagonists as always simple, virtuous, and noble, while antagonists are always mindless, hateful, and soulless.  This is one of the reasons I consider Million Dollar Baby to be one of the most wildly overrated movies in history.  However, he doesn't completely fall into that trap with Sully, a beautifully acted examination of the events taking place after the "Miracle on the Hudson" airplane landing of 2009.  Yes, Captain Sullenberger, as portrayed by the fantastic Tom Hanks, is noble and kind-hearted, but the antagonists, who consist of the hearing committee trying to determine if he acted wrongly, are just people trying to get their job done and ultimately are relieved to be proven wrong.  Plus, this movie does the impossible in creating absolute suspense surrounding an event so well recorded and publicized.  You know how it's going to end, but the journey is poignant, thoughtful, and, at times,  harrowing.

10. Fences - Definitely not the most re-watchable film ever made, but certainly a powerfully transportative one, Fences boasts some amazing dialogue (from August Wilson's lauded stage play) and two of the hands-down best performances of the year.  There's a reason that Denzel Washington and Viola Davis are considered the best in their field.  It's a two hour acting and writing masterclass, but it's also a heartfelt examination of family and the unwillingness to allow the world around us to change.

9. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story - Rogue One, while a visceral movie-going experience, didn't excite and energize me the way The Force Awakens did, but that was never its goal.  Rogue One is a war movie, frankly the first in the series, taking place in the Star Wars timeline.  It's "The Dirty Dozen in Space" and the grit from the story is tactile and omnipresent.  Much has been made of how simply defined the characters are, but this is a mission movie.  It's less about complex character arcs that are designed to grow and reach over several films than it is about people willing to do what needs to be done, even in the face of death.  It's complexity lies not in its characterizations, but in its examination of war itself.  The good guys are good, but sometimes do horrific things and justify it for "the cause." Whether the ends of war truly justify the means has been a subject of debate for years and Rogue One addresses the topic with a thoughtful solemnity, all while loading the screen with some of the best action sequences in the series history.

8. Sing Street - Taking place in 1985 Dublin, Sing Street is the spiritual relative of the best John Hughes films.  Like those movies, it checks off the archetypes (Awkward teen romance? check. Disfunctional, yet ultimately loving family? check. Powerfully clueless authority figure? check.) and like the best of those movies it layers in unforgettable characters, tons of heart, and a fantastic soundtrack, including the above mentioned "Drive It Like You Stole It," a song that sums up the film's central themes of embracing life, taking control of your own destiny, and not looking back.

7. Queen of Katwe - Rapturously embraced by critics, but largely ignored by audiences, Queen of Katwe tells the story of Phiona Mutesi, a young girl from Uganda living in extreme poverty who discovers chess and uses it as a way to pull herself and her family out of the ghetto.  It simultaneously plays as a sports movie and a family drama and succeeds greatly in both areas.  Filled with wonderful performances and direction from acclaimed filmmaker Mira Nair that is unflinching in how it presents the truth of poverty, it's a movie that deserves a bigger audience.  A family film that is enlightening and inspiring in equal measure.

6. Doctor Strange - I have heard people dismiss this as just a trippy remake of Iron Man, but other than the fact that the central character is a wealthy jerk who learns to be less of a jerk (and really, if your protagonist starts as a wealthy jerk, there are only so many ways that arc is going to bend), it is completely and thrillingly its own creature.  Director Scott Derrickson is actually best known for his work in horror films and, while Strange is certainly not a horror film, it shares a similar visual and rhythmic palette.  To call the aesthetics of this movie "trippy" is a profound understatement.  It throws us into the mystical corners of the Marvel universe head first with a cornucopia of visuals unlike anything I've ever seen on screen.  Of course, this would be worth little if the movie weren't as good as it is.  Taking a simple, but profound message extolling the virtues of selfless empathy, it expertly uses the best in effects, acting, music, and direction to weave a truly memorable tale and one of the best comic book origin stories ever put on film.

5. Zootopia - I was surprised this one was as high as it is and, in any other year, it may have been lower.  However, this bright, quickly paced, animated blockbuster is a pure winner with one of the most timely and needed messages of any film this year.  Instead of populating the story with animals because they're cute and cuddly, it uses the animal kingdom as a metaphor for prejudice and the danger of living life in fear instead of love.  The messages, while not particularly subtle, are well-executed and so important in learning to understand one another.  Plus, Flash the sloth is awesome.

4. Captain America: Civil War - Look past the sheen of yet another Marvel blockbuster in the marketplace and you see the thoughtful heart beating not only at the center of Civil War, but the center of the MCU as a whole.  Character motivations that lead to the titular skirmish have been carefully cultivated for years as we've not only gotten to know the characters, but understand the dynamics of their relationships with one another.  Seeing the other MCU films is certainly not a requirement to enjoy Civil War, but it absolutely makes the experience richer.  Technically, the movie is an unqualified winner with great performances, dialogue, and action (including the aforementioned Tarmac scene, which is fantastic).  Add to that the movie's thoughtful take on political manipulation and the complexities of diplomacy and you get what is arguably the best the MCU has yet to offer.

3. Arrival - The best sci-fi films use the fantastic to reflect the simple and immediate nature of humanity and, in this, Arrival stands as one of the great sci-fi films of the decade.  Deeply emotional and profoundly personal, this film uses the very act of communication as a way to examine the best and the worst that humanity has to offer.  In addition, the finale explores the intricate nature of relationships and life choices in a way so surprising and moving that one leaves the film better for having experienced it. 

2. La La Land - A few years ago, the film The Artist won over critics and audiences alike.  The Artist was a highly artistic tribute to silent films and it used the power of silence to draw the watcher in to the story.  However, I always thought it was just the smallest bit overrated.  It was very well made and very well acted, but it felt a bit gimmicky.  Other than the punchline use of sound at the end, making it a silent movie didn't seem vital to the story.  Similarly La La Land pays tribute to a film genre of the past, specifically MGM-style movie musicals, however the use of music, and specifically this style of music, is integral to the story.  La La Land uses the inherent artifice of grand movie musicals as a metaphor about the stages of romance and setting it in modern times just makes it more powerful.  In addition, it takes one of the most annoying tendencies of those old movies (to stop the story dead for a huge and completely cheesy dance number on a Hollywood soundstage) and finally, FINALLY makes it necessary to the story with a surprisingly thoughtful finale that simultaneously exhilarates and devastates.  

1. Kubo and the Two Strings - Speaking of overrated, I've not quite gotten the critical fervor for the films of Laika Studios until this one.  I mean, they're clearly masterclasses in stop-motion animation and have amazing art coming out of their ears, but ultimately they have felt a bit cold and distant, so afraid of being sentimental that they forget to have a heart.  That ended with Kubo, which stands as one of the great animated films of the decade, easily at home with the best of Pixar studios.  This is the most striking, original, and moving film I've seen this year, which is why it lands at the top.

Fifteen Most Anticipated of 2017
So, with that, it's time for my most anticipated movies of the new year.  Anticipation is a funny thing.  Sometimes it proves to be wildly misplaced (*cough cough* Batman v Superman *cough*), but when the end product matches your level of pre-conceived enthusiasm, the experience can be transcendent.  These are the films that I'm hoping will give me the euphoria of met expectations (Note: Hidden Figures and A Monster Calls would likely be on this list, as they are receiving their wide-releases this Friday, however they are, technically 2016 releases because of their initial limited runs):

15. Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets - Could be a spectacular disaster or a surprising success, but from the commercials it really doesn't look like there will be any middle ground.

14. Justice League - DC, I've been burned by you before, but I'm cautiously hopeful that you'll pull this one off.

13. The Story of Ferdinand - The original story and subsequent Disney short about the bull with the heart of a lamb is one of my childhood favorites.  Here's hoping that a feature-length expansion and the fact that it's from the very hit-and-miss Blue Sky Studios won't diminish its charms.

12. 2017 Cloverfield Movie - Scheduled for an October release, the next film in the Cloverfield franchise is intriguing, even with no fore-knowledge of what it's about.

11. Thor: Ragnarok - A buddy action movie with this cast starring Thor and the Hulk?  Yeah, I'm in.

10. Murder on the Orient Express - A remake of the classic directed by Kenneth Brannagh and starring Brannagh, Johnny Depp, Dame Judi Dench, Michelle Pfieffer, Daisy Ridley, Michael Pena, Josh Gad, and Leslie Odom Jr.  'Nuff said.

9. Wonder Woman - Honestly, if I weren't so disheartened by the DCCU thus far, this would be higher.  I just hope it's good.

8. The LEGO Batman Movie - The LEGO Movie was a fantasmagorium of laughs and imagination and the Batman character (played hilariously by Will Arnett) was an integral part of that film's humor.  While I don't expect this to have the heart of The LEGO Movie, I expect it will be a lot of fun.

7. The Greatest Showman on Earth - I know little about this film other than it's a musical based on the life of P.T. Barnum starring Hugh Jackman and that it's being released at the end of the year for award consideration.  Also the screenplay is by Michael Arndt (Toy Story 3) and the music is from the composers behind La La Land.  Those elements are enough to make this highly intriguing. 

6. Beauty and the Beast - Disney is on a roll with the live-action versions of their animated classics.  This one looks to take it's cue equally from the stage version and the original fairy tale, so it should feel fresh even as we're singing familiar songs.

5. Spider-Man: Homecoming - No, the world doesn't need another Spider-Man movie.  It needs one with Tom Holland riffing off of Robert Downey Jr in the Marvel Cinematic Universe!

4. Dunkirk - Christopher Nolan is a master at building excitement for his films.  The little bits of this film, a war film set during WWII, that we've seen have been taut, tense, and utterly spellbinding.

3. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 - Baby Groot!  Also, the promise of more fun from the great makers of the original.  But, BABY GROOT!!!

2. Coco - Pixar has been less consistent over the last six years, but they seem to be the best when they're making originals rather than sequels that don't contain the words "Toy Story."  This film, a musical from the director of Toy Story 3 dealing with The Day of the Dead, seems as separated from the rest of the studios canon as can be, which could be a good thing.

1. Star Wars: Episode VIII - Besides the fact that, until five years ago,  I never thought I'd live to see a movie called Star Wars: Episode VIII, we need some clarity.  Rey Skywalker?  Rey Solo?  Rey Kenobi?  Rey the Hutt?!?  Give us answers!

OK, that's the end of my ramblings.  Happy 2017! May the force be with you and be excellent to each other!

Friday, December 16, 2016

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story - Review

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story/Walt Disney/Dir. by Gareth Edwards/Rated PG-13 for extended sequences of sci-fi violence and action

When Disney purchased Lucasfilm in 2012, reaction among hardcore Star Wars fans was equal part anticipation and dread.  While many were thrilled that they would see Episode VII, something that most had resigned to the realm of impossibility, many others were worried that they would watch the much-loved "galaxy far, far away" become homogenized and "Disney-fied" with an eye more focused on corporate synergy and profit than on character and story.  Of course, It would be naive of me to say that Disney didn't have the bottom-line in mind when they made the purchase,  However, as was the case when they bought Pixar and Marvel, Disney has shown that the best way to make that all-important profit is by caring about character and story first and foremost.  While the newest chapter in the Star Wars universe, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, could easily be dismissed as merely another cog in the never-ending machine that is Disney, it's clear from the outset that the actual creative talent behind the film are true fans who want to tell the best story they can in the best way possible.  In fact, with The Force Awakens and Rogue One, it could be argued that the real effect of Disney on the Star Wars universe is a willingness to get dark, to employ more multi-dimensional story elements, and a deepening complexity in the series' heroes and villains.

Stemming from the events described in the opening crawl text of the first Star Wars film, Rogue One is the story of the rebels who obtained the plans that lead to the destruction of the first Death Star. Specifically, it is the story of Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones), a woman with a shady past who is recruited by the Rebel Alliance in hopes that her connection with a mysterious anti-Imperial militia leader named Saw Gerrera (Forest Whitaker) will lead to a partnership.  Jyn agrees, but not out of any love for the cause.  She's in it to find out more information about her father, Galen Erso (Mads Mikkelsen), who most of the rebels believe to be a traitor deeply entrenched in the Empire, but whom Jyn believes to be working to bring down the Empire from within.

Along the way, she meets the rest of her "dirty dozen" or rather "half-dozen", including an ethically dubious rebel assassin (Diego Luna), a re-programmed Imperial droid (Alan Tudyk), two mysterious Guardians of the Whills (Donnie Yen and Wen Jiang), and an Imperial pilot that defected for the cause (Riz Ahmed).  

While Rogue One is clearly visually rooted in the Star Wars universe, it is the least Star Wars-y of the franchise if only for the fact that these characters are not magical or "chosen ones."  No Skywalkers or Solos here.  They're the foot soldiers that fight and, at times, die so that Han, Luke, and Chewbacca can get medals and be celebrated in grand award ceremonies.  That alone makes this a grittier and more intense experience.  While we might be mildly concerned for the well-being of the main characters in any other chapter of the Star Wars story, we're constantly aware that any of our new favorites in Rogue One could die at any time as jarringly and unceremoniously as any soldier in any war.  In fact, this is the first Star Wars film to really address the ultimate sacrifice of war and the utter conviction of purpose that drives a soldier.

That acting in Rogue One is strong throughout with Oscar-nominee Jones bringing to vivid life another great heroine in the saga.  Luna is equally impressive, especially creating an empathy toward a character with a rather gray sense of morality.  His General Andor has been fighting against the Empire for so long, that he has become a believer in an "ends justify the means" sort of worldview, even if those means include killing innocent people.  Luna does a great job showing the weight of war on his face, even as his experiences with this mission change him for the better.  Tudyk, who has recently become Disney's good luck charm in the vocal performance arena, steals every scene as K-2SO, a droid with C-3PO's skill, Han Solo's sarcasm, and R2-D2's implied talent for well-timed put-downs (sure, we never understand R2, but you just know he's got a way with an insult).

Director Edwards, who most recently directed the 2014 Godzilla reboot, artfully mixes the old and new, imprinting his own impressive visual style with the well-worn look of a Star Wars film.  In addition, he choreographs the climactic battle of the film with ease and vigor, something that is missing a bit in the first act of the film, which can, at times, feel a little disjunct.

But that finale.....whew!  It seems hardly possible after 40 years (has it really been 40 years?!?) that we could see images that surprise us in a Star Wars film, but the final act of Rogue One is a stunner. Seamlessly weaving three different battles (much like the finale of Return of the Jedi), is it filled to the rim with everything we love about Star Wars (Space battles!  AT-ATs!  Fish aliens yelling orders!), yet it manages to surprise and excite (a clever strategy in battling Star Destroyers is particularly fun).  Plus, it give us a potent example of why Darth Vader is the ultimate bad guy in a scene that, in another context, could have felt just at home in a "there's a killer lose in the house" film. Think a horror movie villain armed with a lightsaber and the ability to do that force choke thing.  Eeek.

Another splendid element of the film is Michael Giacchino's masterful score.  Hired to write the music for the film a mere two months before its release, he manages to create a score that marries the musical language of John Williams with his own sense of melody and progression.  One could easily see it being written by Maestro Williams, yet it is also distinctly in Giacchino's voice.  It's a memorable and evocative accompaniment to a memorable and evocative film.

Rogue One isn't a perfect film and it doesn't inspire in me the same sense of "Insta-Favorite" enthusiasm that I felt with The Force Awakens, but it's almost better that it doesn't because it's not that kind of film.  Yes, it's fun.  Yes, it has light moments.  However, this is a movie that makes you feel more than just nostalgia or visceral popcorn-movie euphoria.  In it's own small way, Rogue One makes you ponder the lives of the unremarkable people who do remarkable things because it's the right thing to do, no matter how difficult or ominous, which might be the most noble message found in any of the Star Wars films.  After all, it is all about a new hope.

Grade: A-

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Summer 2016 in Review: Some Good, Not Much Great, Lots o' M'eh


My classroom is set, my seating charts are made, and my beginning lesson plans are created.  It must be fall.  I've mentioned this before, but there is usually a bitter-sweet air that hangs on Labor Day weekend for me.  I really am looking forward to a new school year, but, being the massive movie nerd that I am, it means that the summer movie season is over.  However, this year I'm not as sad because this year the summer movie season was......kinda weak.   Both in quality and in box-office performance, this really wasn't one for the record books.

Sequels that nobody asked for unsurprisingly died quick deaths,  Mediocre "sleeper" movies over-performed because there wasn't much else worth seeing.  Reboots were met with steely indifference (even the one that deserved better).  There was just a lot of "m'eh" this year.

Oddly, some of the best entertainment to be found this summer was on Netflix, which presented the cultural sensation Stranger Things (equal parts Spielberg and King) and The Little Prince, a foreign animated film that was bafflingly passed on by every major American distributor, but finally brought to the states by the streaming giant.  Had it been released in theaters, The Little Prince would likely be on my year-end top ten list.

However, there were some lights in the cinematic darkness.  Let's focus on them first....

THE GREAT
Kubo and the Two Strings
This film, made by the local geniuses at Laika Animation studios, was the best film of the summer, a fact that surprised me.  Laika has consistently shown wild innovation and creativity, but nothing in their previous work showed me that they were capable of this level depth and heart.  I hesitate to say too much about the story for a simple reason, this is a movie that deserves to experienced with fresh eyes.  Beauty in animation is certainly not a new thing, but it's rare that any film, regardless of genre or technique, reaches this level of art.  Thrilling, moving, breath-taking, this is the first instant-classic from this wonderful studio.


Captain America: Civil War
The best Avengers movie, in spite of the fact that it's not technically an Avengers movie, Civil War was a beautiful example of everything that Marvel has gotten so incredibly right with their cinematic universe.  Instead of rushing character development and plot, a major failing of that other comic book cinematic universe, Marvel has been building these relationships for a period of eight years over several films and they do a splendid job of making these developments feel organic and oddly inevitable.  Directors Joe and Anthony Russo (who made their debut in the MCU with the superb Captain America: The Winter Soldier) not only make this a vital extension of that story, but masterfully meld that story with the events of several other Marvel franchises to create a film that manages to be a thrilling and surprisingly well-rounded popcorn masterpiece.  I can't think of another film this year that has so masterfully balanced weight and humor, all while juggling a huge cast and introducing two very important characters to such an expansive world.  Definitely a movie that will be spun on my blu-ray player on a regular rotation.


The Very Good
Finding Dory
Pixar's latest, which has also now become their most successful film to date, really was as good of a sequel as we could have gotten.  Especially considering the fact that the original Finding Nemo was a perfectly constructed film that ended beautifully and in no way lent itself to becoming a franchise.  Honestly, this might have gotten to "great" status for me if not for some very lazy call backs to the original.  There's about a ten minute section toward the beginning that could have just been left on the cutting room floor and I would have liked this one much more than I did.  As it is though, Pixar did a wonderful job taking a plot device that had been played for laughs in the first film (Dory's short-term memory loss) and made a film that pays tribute to every person who has ever had to find their way through life in spite of great adversity.  Plus, baby Dory (seen above) is just about the cutest animated character in the history of the medium and the short shown before Dory, the delightful Piper, is among Pixar's best.

Star Trek Beyond
While the latest installment of the rebooted Trek series doesn't reach the heights of the previous films, it's still a perfectly cromulant Star Trek film with some great action, terrific acting, and moments of unexpected poignancy, especially when paying tribute to fallen members of its cast.  The plot feels more old-school than more recent Trek adventures, but it's much more than a series place-holder.  Director Justin Lin, new to the franchise, does himself proud.

Florence Foster Jenkins
Among classical musicians, especially vocalists, Florence Foster Jenkins is a legend.  Listening to  her performances (and subsequently laughing yourself silly because of them) is almost a right of passage in your training.  You see, Foster Jenkins was a unique force in the music world who had money, a desire to perform, and a.....well.......unique vocal instrument.  What director Stephen Frears and the always brilliant Meryl Streep have done in telling her story is let you see her as a person rather than a caricature.  This makes for a compelling film, but also an oddly guilt-producing one.  While the movie encourages you to laugh at her voice in the beginning, it imbues her with such warmth and humanity that by the end you feel like you were previously duped into being a bully by laughing.  Don't get me wrong, it's a terrific movie, but it also is a film with a split-personality, begging you to laugh, then chastising you for doing so.

 Ghostbusters
The level of bile and animosity spewed at this funny, fast-paced, highly enjoyable movie baffles me.  Yeah, the original is great.  I know this.  I love it too.  However, I also love the concept enough to look forward to a revisiting, especially one done with this much joy and respect.  In fact, this movie's biggest failing is that it feels beholden to unnecessary references to the original.  The cameos (including Slimer and Mr. Stay-Puft) pull you out of a story that is strongly it's own thing.  The cast, including standouts Kate McKinnon and Chris Hemsworth, is uniformly terrific, the special effects are great, and the humor rarely fails (starting with an amusing and memorable cameo from The Office's Zach Woods and ending with an extended credits sequence in which Hemsworth gets down with his bad self).  Is this better than the original?  Of course not.  However, it's almost as good, which is really saying something.  I wish it had performed better at the box office, because I would very much like to see more from this cast playing in this world.

Pete's Dragon/The BFG
Both wonderful family films with similar messages, these two performed modestly at the box-office, but should enjoy a long life in home video.  Both also display a surprising level of subtlety (barring, of course, a few moments in The BFG that wander into slightly crude humor that is to be found in most modern family films).  It's so heartening to know that filmmakers are still willing to make films for younger audiences that still have a sense of craftsmanship.

Honorable Mentions
Jason Bourne, X-Men: Apocalypse, Cafe Society

The Disappointing
Suicide Squad
Why do I get the feeling that the screaming and obnoxious internet whiners who proclaimed the new Ghostbusters movie to be the worst thing ever created weeks before its release are the same ones who petitioned to have Rotten Tomatoes shut down because critics didn't like Suicide Squad?  Suicide Squad is simply not a good movie.  It's not horrible, but still.  The actors do their best, with Margot Robbie acquitting herself the best, a feat made more impressive by the fact that she gets it done in spite of her ridiculous wardrobe.  I can't remember the last time I saw a film with characters about which I cared so little.  How can we be expected to enjoy a movie with no characters to root for?  They're all terrible people, including the "good" guys, plus the character "development" is so shallow that it almost inspires the audience to just root for the universal destruction of everyone on screen just to get the whole thing over with.  DC Comics is filled with such wonderful and memorable characters, it's just depressing to see how horribly Warner Bros. is botching the new DCEU, especially considering how glorious the Nolan Batman movies were.

So...yeah.  This summer was kinda....blah.  I'm thrilled that Kubo and Captain America: Civil War exist and I'll definitely re-watch my other favorites often, but here's hoping that next summer, a movie season that will include Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Wonder Woman, Spider-Man: Homecoming, War for the Planet of the Apes, Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan's WWII epic), and....(sigh) Cars 3....fares better.  For now, bring on the 16-17 school year!


Saturday, July 23, 2016

Movie Review: Star Trek Beyond

Star Trek Beyond/Paramount Pictures/Dir. by Justin Lin/120 min./Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action and violence

In terms of how to do a reboot of a beloved franchise right, I believe there's Nolan's Dark Knight films and J.J. Abrams' Star Trek films (also known as the Kelvin timeline to fans).  Both series took what was great about the properties, made them their own, focused on character as well as spectacle, were impeccably cast, and allowed their actors to shine.  Both series have films that are universally revered among fans and films that are highly divisive among fans, in spite of the fact that all entries were heralded by critics.

2009's Star Trek was revelatory.  Rather than do dry impersonations of the classic Star Trek actors, the new cast simply inhabited the roles with such confidence that trivialities, like the fact that they really don't look like the original cast looked at that age, became completely moot.  They simply were the crew of the Enterprise.  In addition, thanks to Abrams' sure-handed direction, the film felt more purely cinematic than any previous Star Trek movie.  Space was 3-dimensional, meaning that ships in space didn't always look like they were on a horizontal plane.  Battles packed a huge punch and stakes were immediately through the roof.  (I mean, they blew up Vulcan in the first hour for heavens' sake!)

For many, Star Trek Into Darkness was a huge misstep.  I am not among those people.  While I can understand people being disappointed that the second film mirrored the second film in the original film series, but I found it to be a thoughtful and intelligent look at the ideas of fate and change in destiny based on the new timeline.  This Kirk would make these choices.  This Spock would scream "Khaaaaaan!" and then hunt the madman down.  I loved it.

However, for those who wish that Into Darkness would have just gone exploring into space, your wish is granted with Star Trek Beyond.  No Federation hearings, no flirting with alien women at the Academy, no villain who turns out to be the classic series villain that you suspected it was from the beginning.  The "Beyond" in the title is telling the truth.

The Enterprise is in year three of its five year mission.  The crew has slipped into a malaise of routine and diplomatic negotiations, and the senior crew is going through several personal existential crisis. The ship docks at the Yorktown, a deep space station/city and Captain Kirk hopes that the respite will invigorate the crew, but is also secretly considering giving up his chair for a desk job at the station. Fortunately, that decision will have to wait because a mysterious alien arrives asking for help in recovering her missing crew.

The ensuing journey ends up separating the crew of the Enterprise and stranding them on a planet with no apparent means of escape and encounter a new ally named Jaylah (beautifully played by Sofia Boutella), a strong-willed alien who informs the crew about the evil Krall (Idris Elba), who is the reason they are in their current predicament.  They must organize a plan to save crew members who were captured and stop Krall from his evil plans.

Star Trek Beyond contains all of the elements that make this franchise fantastic, including great performances, viscerally exciting action sequences, stunning visuals (particularly the amazingly conceived Yorktown space station), and another wonderful Michael Giacchino score.  However, it separates itself in plot and in the fact that it definitely has a more old-school Star Trek vibe.  In some ways, it feels like a lost installment of the original film series.  In fact, in theme and design, it reminded me most specifically of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, which happens to be one of my very favorite of the original cast films.

One of the most pleasant surprises of the movie is the terrific direction from Justin Lin, whose hiring as director was quite controversial when first announced.  After all, when I think cerebral sci-fi, my first thought isn't the dude from the Fast and Furious movies.  However, he does a wonderful job balancing character and action with a truly engaging visual flair.  

All in all, Star Trek Beyond is a fun and entertaining movie.  It does feel a bit like a place holder film, but it's so enjoyable that you won't care and it is a more than worthy entry in the Abrams-era films.

Grade: A-

Friday, July 15, 2016

Movie Review: Ghostbusters

Ghostbusters/Columbia Pictures/116 min./Dir. by Paul Feig/Rated PG-13 for supernatural action and some crude humor

Summer 1984, Blackfoot, Idaho, Plaza Twin Theater, screen #2.  What was a fun movie experience for many became really a pivotal moment in my personal development.  You see, as a kid, my highly active imagination was a double-edged sword.  On one hand I was able to lose myself in hours of joyful flights of fancy.  On the other, everything scared me because my imagination would add about a thousand more points of horror to any already terrifying thing.  Be it a story or a news report on nuclear war or a snake in the garden, everything was exaggerated in my mind.  A commercial for a scary movie could keep me up all night, yet I was oddly obsessed with scary things too.  I wouldn't watch scary movies, but I would make people tell me about every frame, which I would then magnify in my mind to horrors not achievable by a mere movie.

Then came 1984, my 13th birthday, and Ghostbusters.   I wanted to see it because all of my friends had and, since it was a comedy, I thought I could handle it.  Of course, the original Ghostbusters had some pretty effective scares.  Ghost librarians screaming and turning into skeletal specters, giant four-legged demons, horrific possessions....this movie had some legitimate jumps accompanying the laughs.  However, I was doing OK.  Then at the end of the film, when the demi-god Gozer, she of the gelled-hair, skin-tight Solid Gold dancer outfit, and glowing red-eyes, arrived to release the Destructor on New York City and Ray Stantz accidentally thought of a form in which the Destructor would appear, I was getting scared.  The music was tense and there was some terrifying visage moving in between skyscrapers.  Then Dan Aykroyd uttered the words, "It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man" and that giant, smiling anthropomorphized tower of sugar rounded an intersection, and I laughed.  I laughed harder than I had ever laughed in my entire life.  I laughed for at least ten minutes straight and I remember laughing still as my family walked, somewhat embarrassedly, out of the theater.  That day, I didn't just watch a movie that I would love for decades to come, I learned that my fears had less power than my joy.  Much like a real-life riddikulus spell from Harry Potter, I learned that laughing at my fears robbed them of their power.  This was also around the time that I began to lucid dream, giving me control of the terrors in my subconscious as well.

After having seen the remake of Ghostbusters, I could easily see this film serving a similar function in a similarly minded youth of today.  Is it a classic?  No, but the main thing that makes the original a classic is nostalgia.  While this incarnation isn't quite as good, it's very close, and it's a very fun time at the movies.

Of course, this movie has been surrounded by controversy ever since it was announced.  Some of the outcry against it was clearly a misguided, misogynistic reaction to the announcement that the new team would be comprised of very funny women instead of very funny men, but mostly people didn't like the idea of a remake of Ghostbusters.  They wanted a straight-up sequel, and at the time, I felt the same way, or at least some kind of a reboot that didn't erase what came before, much like the new Star Trek movies had done.  However, now I'm delighted by the change.  Seeing this group come together, find their purpose, and build their own different, but equally funny chemistry is a joy and I hope we get to see them do it in more stories to come.

Scientists and friends Erin Gilbert (Kristen Wiig) and Abby Yates (Melissa McCarthy) have been estranged for years after co-writing a book on the paranormal (the hilariously titled "Ghosts From Our Past (both literally and figuratively)") which widely discredited them as quacks.  Erin distanced herself from the book (claiming to have burned "both copies") while Abby embraced their work and moved forward with their research.  However, a haunting at a historic mansion in N.Y.C. brings them together, along with Abby's live-wire colleague, Jillian Holtzmann (Kate McKinnon) and sets them on their new career path in paranormal investigation and elimination.  After a brief flirtation with a familiar firehouse (turns out such a large piece of real estate is a bit pricey in current day New York), they end up setting stakes in a space above a Chinese restaurant, hire a new secretary (Chris Hemsworth, whose take on the antiquated blonde, bimbo secretary archetype steals the show), and bring on a new partner (Leslie Jones, whose presence and performance is much stronger than they appeared to be in the trailers).  Things start to get heated when the group discover machines scattered throughout the city that magnify paranormal activity, the end result of which leads to a fantasmagorical Times Square battle in which buildings, billboards, and advancing spooks emerge through the mists of varying time periods to confront the jump-suited soldiers of science and paranormal metaphysics.  

The key ingredients for a good Ghostbusters movie are humor, cast chemistry, and convincing special effects/scares.  This is a good Ghostbusters movie.  Not all of the jokes land, but the ratio is strong.  It's the most I've laughed during a movie in a very long time and it's not simply because of the quality of the jokes themselves, but because of the strength of the performances and the characterizations.  The cast feels like they're having the time of their lives throughout.  While McKinnon and Jones get more of the conventional jokes, Wiig and McCarthy still get their fair share of the funny and, as I mentioned, Hemsworth steals every scene with an quirky combination of ineptitude, naivite, misplaced-cockiness, and utter obliviousness.  In fact, many of Wiig's funniest moments involve him, and her take on the 50's stereotype of the boss making inappropriate advances on the ditzy secretary.

The scares are there, but they're not quite as potent as the first film (however, pretty much everything here is an improvement on the second Ghostbusters film, especially considering the weakly written finale of Ghostbusters II), and the special effects are very effective.  The 3D version is quite well made, using a changing film ratio to allow spectral vapors and spraying ectoplasm to seemingly spill beyond the limits of the screen.

Another fun addition is the proliferation of new ghostbusting tools.  Whereas the original film was just about capturing the ghosts, this team has an arsenal of weapons that can not only capture the malevolent phantoms, but can shred, gooify, and sock them on their paranormal kisser.  McKinnon gets an especially memorable butt-kicking glory moment using all of the new toys.

There are many elements that were in the trailers and tv spots that were handled far better in the film than the advertising presented them.   Yes, Mr. Stay-Puft shows up, but in a way that pays tribute to the original film without ripping it off.  Yes, the ghost from the famous logo shows up, but the narrative makes his appearance not merely palatable, but seemingly inevitable.  Yes, Slimer shows up, but his glorified cameo (and the baffling appearance of a Ms. Slimer) actually lead to a pivotal plot point.

Director Paul Feig clearly has a respect and affinity for the original film, in fact, sometimes maybe a little too much so.  Most of the original cast shows up in cameos (except for Rick Moranis, who passed) and those cameos are varying levels of successful (Bill Murray's was the most delightful for me).  The original Ray Parker Jr. theme song shows up performed by no fewer than three artists and multiple orchestral cues in Theodore Shapiro's score (which was otherwise more dramatic and tense than Elmer Bernstein's jaunty work in the first film).  Hopefully, if the film is successful enough to warrant a sequel, Feig, or whoever is at the reins, will feel more a sense of moving forward than looking back.

So, in summation, rest assured.  This film will rob no one of their childhood.  It is neither a travesty nor an abomination.  What it IS is a fun, breezy summer popcorn movie that pays tribute to the past while creating a world and an energy all its own.  Plus, it proves the same thing that the original did to me all those 32 years ago: it's more difficult to be afraid when you're laughing with pure abandon.

Grade: B+

P.S.  Stay through the credits.  Not only is there a fun song and dance bit throughout, but after the final credit rolls, there's a juicy hint as to where the series could go from here that will be especially meaningful to fans of the first movie.

Friday, July 8, 2016

Movie Review: The Secret Life of Pets

The Secret Life of Pets/Universal-Illumination/90 min./Dir. by Yarrow Cheney and Chris Renaud/Rated PG for action and some rude humor

I have always loved animals, but I never really understood the passion of pet owners until I became one.  His name is Pippin, he's a terrier/chihuahua mix (far more terrier than chihuahua in look and personality), and he's the cutest, best behaved, move lovable dog ever.  Of course, all pet owners feel that way about our pets and therein is the key to understanding our mindset.....our pets are part of the family.  Calling them our "kids", a tendency that seemed silly to me five years ago, is merely an expression of how profoundly they've cuddled their way into our hearts and changed our lives.  Pippin and Mali (our very own "soft kitty") have comforted through times of pain, romped through times of joy, and shown us how very much we have to learn from them.

Therefore, when the first trailer for The Secret Life of Pets premiered last year in front of Minions, I was thrilled.  Sure, there have been countless animated films inhabited by animals, but this was the first one that looked like it was going to address the idiosyncrasies and personalities of actual pets.   Then further trailers revealed more about the story and my excitement level began to lessen.  It began to look like another by the numbers zany animated film, with a street-talking rabbit and plenty of lowest-common-denominator toilet humor.

Now after having seen it, I'm delighted to say that, while it's not the perfect ode to housepets that I hoped it would be, it's not the mindless, generic laugh generator that last year's Minions was.

If you're familiar with that first teaser trailer, the one that shows what the different pets get up to when their masters leave, then you've pretty much seen the first three minutes of the movie.  Our hero is a terrier named Max (Louis C.K.) who is living the perfect life with his master Katie (Ellie Kemper).  They play, the cuddle, they stare wide-eyed at the New York City skyline...the only hiccup to their life is that, for reasons Max can't fathom, Katie leaves every morning.  In fact, he misses her so much that he just sits by the door waiting for her until she comes home.  However, one day, she doesn't come home alone, having adopted a giant mutt named Duke (Eric Stonestreet).  Duke is big and messy and determined to take over as alpha dog, something that Max can't abide.

This rivalry erupts while the dogs are being walked by a not particularly attentive dog walker and the two end up collar-less and left to fend for themselves on the mean streets of New York, streets ruled by an adorable looking, but psychotic buck-tooth bunny named Snowball (Kevin Hart) who is leading an anti-human movement populated by the "Flushed Pets" (i.e. any pets who were abandoned).

The mid-section of Pets is where things get a little more frantic, but fortunately, it's got some surprisingly bizarre humor to keep things interesting, including an unnecessary, but hilarious, side-trip to a sausage factory.

The Secret Life of Pets absolutely works best when it's interpreting common behaviors of animals, making these widely-known idiosyncrasies character traits and allowing a strong and immediate connection to this ragtag group of animals.  The voice-work is uniformly excellent, including Hart, who, based on the trailers, I had some concerns about.  Louis C.K. especially gives Max a warmth and a heart that is vitally necessary for this character.

The screenplay, by the team responsible for the Despicable Me movies, is zippy, funny, and heart-felt, the latter element being something that was painfully missing from Illumination's last effort, Minions

Overall, The Secret Life of Pets is not perfect and not quite as engaging as the adventures of Gru, but it's fast-paced, filled with humor, and ends on a tender note guaranteed to put a little bit of a lump in the throat of any of us who consider ourselves pet lovers.  Bring the kids and have a great time.  It might even teach the kids to love their four-legged friends even more.

Grade: B+

Friday, July 1, 2016

Movie Review: The BFG

The BFG/Dir. by Steven Spielberg/Walt Disney Pictures/117 min./Rated PG for action/peril, some scary moments and brief rude humor

The BFG is a film of firsts.  It's the first film Steven Spielberg has ever directed for Walt Disney Pictures.  It's also Spielberg's first live-action children's book adaptation.  It's the first Walt Disney film scored by legendary composer John Williams.  However, what makes it special and bittersweet is that it is also a notable last.  It is the last film with a screenplay by Melissa Mathison, the celebrated writer of E.T. and The Black Stallion.  Her heart, intelligence, and sense of wonder is in every frame, which, when combined with the original story by Roald Dahl and the visual brilliance of Spielberg, makes for a special, if somewhat uneven, film-going experience.

Sophie (terrifically played by Ruby Barnhill in her film debut) is an inquisitive, intelligent, and unusually brave and responsible little girl who is also an orphan that suffers from chronic insomnia.  This combination of personality traits all contribute her being abducted by a mysterious giant (Mark Rylance) who is ultimately revealed to be big and friendly.  Worried that she would reveal the existence of giants to the general populace after seeing him, the big, friendly giant (henceforth known as The BFG) takes Sophie to the land of the giants.  Unfortunately for Sophie, the BFG is the only giant to which the "friendly" moniker could be applied, especially considering their fondness for the taste of human "beans."

The BFG is short on story, but big on charm, largely because of the great performances by the two leads and the instant connection they share.  Yes, BFG is entirely motion capture CGI, but there is absolutely no question that Mark Rylance is at the heart of the character, creating perhaps the most engaging CGI character in a live-action movie since Andy Serkis searched for "the precious,"  and his relationship with "brave Sophie" quickly becomes an enchanting delight.

There are moments of pure magic in The BFG, particularly a visit to the land of dreams, which one would expect from the makers of E.T.  Interestingly, the most "Dahl-esque" elements of the movie, the gruesome and repellent non-friendly giants, are so effectively icky that the magic of the rest of the movie drains whenever they appear.  Thankfully, while they play an important role in the story, but they're spoken of more than they are scene.

As usual with a Spielberg movie, the technical elements are top note, with top-tier work from his usual suspects, cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, editor Michael Kahn, and another insta-classic musical score from John Williams.

Unfortunately, I predict that The BFG will be a pretty big flop at the box office for a few reasons.  First, it's simple and sweet...no smart-talking donkeys, no hyper-active minions, no pop-culture references.  There is one running bathroom-humor gag, but even it is innocent and fantastical.  Secondly, it's an expensive fantasy movie based on a three decade-old novel that is certainly not as popular now as it was when I was a kid.  In addition, the marketing assumed that the title and the name Roald Dahl were enough, downplaying the outstanding talent making the film.  Lastly, Disney released it two weeks after they released their own Finding Dory, which was clearly going to be a mega-blockbuster.

However, if you're looking for a sweet, simple, old-fashioned family film, something not perfect, but warm and enchanting, then The BFG would fit the bill quite nicely.

Grade: B